getBerryByName

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description 'Get information' implies a read-only operation, which is appropriate. However, it lacks any disclosure of behavioral traits such as returned data format, authentication needs, or rate limits. Given no annotations, the description carries the full burden but is minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded and contains no extraneous information. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but vague. It does not specify what kind of berry information is returned (e.g., stats, flavor, firmness) or provide a return type hint, which would be helpful given the lack of an output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter 'name' with schema description 'The name of the berry.' The tool description adds no further meaning beyond what the schema already provides. With 100% schema coverage, the parameter semantics are acceptable at baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves information about a berry using its name. However, it does not differentiate from the many similar 'get*ByName' sibling tools, which also fetch data by name for different entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'getBerryFlavorByName' or 'getBerryFirmnessByName', nor does it mention prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.