Skip to main content
Glama

create_subscription

Set up webhook subscriptions to monitor Microsoft Teams resources for changes (created, updated, deleted) and receive notifications to a specified URL.

Instructions

Create a webhook subscription for change notifications

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resourceYesResource URL to monitor (e.g. /teams/{id}/channels)
change_typeYesType of change (created, updated, deleted)
notification_urlYesURL where notifications are sent
expiration_date_timeNoOptional expiration (ISO 8601, max 3 days)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It only indicates a creation action but offers no details about side effects, return values, authentication needs, or limitations. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence without unnecessary words. It is front-loaded, but the brevity sacrifices useful context. Still, it earns points for being succinct.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 parameters (3 required), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not mention return object, error handling, rate limits, or usage prerequisites. A creation tool with these characteristics requires more explanation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds no clarification beyond the schema. It does not explain parameter constraints (e.g., resource URL format, change_type allowed values, notification_url requirements, or expiration format). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (create) and the resource (webhook subscription), with a specific purpose (change notifications). It distinguishes from siblings like list_subscriptions and delete_subscription.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No context about prerequisites or suitable scenarios. The description is a bare statement without any usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Anupam890/ms-teams-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server