create_online_meeting

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose all behavioral traits. It merely states 'Create an online meeting,' giving no information about side effects, required permissions, rate limits, or whether the operation is reversible. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, but it is essentially a tautology of the tool name. It does not earn its place by providing any new information, making it underspecified rather than concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that the tool has 5 parameters (3 required), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to explain the tool's functionality, return values, or any constraints, leaving the agent without essential context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all parameters with descriptions, so schema_description_coverage is 100%. The baseline score is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, which is acceptable but not exceptional.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Create an online meeting,' which is clear as a verb+resource. However, it essentially repeats the tool name without adding any additional context about the type of meeting (e.g., Teams meeting) or distinguishing it from similar create tools like create_event.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_event) or what prerequisites are needed (e.g., authentication, permissions). The description does not help the agent decide under which circumstances this tool should be invoked.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.