Skip to main content
Glama

get_subscription_info_by_short_uuid

Read-only

Retrieve subscription details from Remnawave by short UUID; use this read-only MCP tool to inspect a specific subscription's info via chat.

Instructions

Get Subscription Info by Short UUID [READ] GET /api/sub/:shortUuid/info

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
shortUuidYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.1

TDQS

D1.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The '[READ] GET' prefix merely echoes the readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false annotations rather than adding context. No mention of authentication requirements, whether the shortUuid is public-facing, or what happens on an unknown ID.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short and front-loaded with the resource, with no filler sentences. However, the second line is largely redundant metadata (a verb repeat plus a raw route), so brevity here reflects under-specification rather than economy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only lookup with no output schema, the description should at least explain what the returned 'info' covers and how it relates to the 'protected' and subpage-config siblings. It does neither, leaving the agent unable to choose confidently among the subscription tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the single parameter shortUuid is left undefined. The description only implies where it goes in the URL path; it says nothing about the expected format or that it identifies a subscription rather than a user. This does not compensate for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only restates the tool name ('Get Subscription Info by Short UUID') and tacks on the raw HTTP route. It names the resource but gives no indication of what 'Subscription Info' contains or how it differs from near-identical siblings like get_subscription_by_short_uuid_protected or get_subpage_config_by_short_uuid.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance whatsoever on when to use this tool, when not to, or which of the many sibling subscription lookups it should be preferred over. The only extra token, the endpoint path, is not usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools