get_subpage_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description corroborates with '[READ]' and adds the underlying HTTP endpoint (GET /api/subscription-page-configs/:uuid), which is real but marginal context; it says nothing about error behavior or what the returned config contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short lines with zero filler, and the resource plus its key discriminator (uuid) is front-loaded. It is appropriately sized for a simple getter, though the endpoint annotation could be considered slightly redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read tool with annotations covering the safety profile and a self-constraining uuid schema, the description supplies the essential identity and discriminator. The only minor gap is that no output schema exists and the shape of the returned config is never hinted at.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the schema itself carries a strict uuid format and regex pattern that fully constrain the single parameter, so the description's contribution ('by uuid' = the config's identifier) is minimal. Baseline 3 is appropriate given the schema's strong type/format constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get subscription page config by uuid'), which is clearer than a bare noun. The 'by uuid' phrasing and singular form implicitly separate it from siblings get_subpage_config_by_short_uuid and get_subpage_configs, though the distinction is never made explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no alternative sibling is named. An agent must infer from the tool name alone that this variant is for a full uuid while get_subpage_config_by_short_uuid takes a short uuid. No prerequisites or context are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.