get_computed_config_profile_by_uuid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, and the description's '[READ]' tag merely restates that. It does add the underlying REST endpoint (GET /api/config-profiles/:uuid/computed-config), which is mildly useful transport context, but says nothing about whether the profile is materialized, cached, or expensive to compute.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short and front-loaded, with the resource named in the first clause. The second line is largely redundant with the name and annotations, costing a little value but not much space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read tool with no output schema, the description is minimally viable: it names the resource and the route. It omits any explanation of the computed profile concept or how the return differs from the sibling endpoint, which is the main gap an agent would need filled.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning; it only echoes 'by uuid' with no additional detail about what the uuid identifies (config profile, not user/node/profile-of-subscription). The schema's format/pattern constrain the value but add no domain semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Get) and resource (computed config profile) keyed by uuid, which distinguishes it reasonably well from the sibling get_config_profile_by_uuid by the 'computed' qualifier. However, it never explains what 'computed' means or how the returned profile differs from the plain config profile, leaving the differentiation implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus the closely named sibling get_config_profile_by_uuid or any other profile endpoint. The only context given is the HTTP route, which does not help an agent decide between alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.