Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to remnawave-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Claude Code, Claude Desktop, or Cursor to read and manage Remnawave 3.x VPN panel resources — users, nodes, hosts, config profiles, squads, subscription templates, billing, and HWID devices — through the panel's REST API, with contract-driven tool schemas, numeric user IDs, multi-panel config lookup, and an optional readonly mode.
      204
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP-aware clients to conversationally manage endpoints, query and triage alerts, inspect events, manage policies and intel feeds, mint enrollment tokens, and preview or commit fleet changes.
      23
      548 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to drive the full Remnawave panel API, exposing one tool per method+path operation (users, nodes, hosts, subscriptions, inbound, bulk actions) plus search, describe, status, audit and metrics helpers. Read-only/read-write gating, deny rules, confirm-preview and dry-run, response secret redaction and an audit journal keep mutations controlled.
      222
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Investigate fraud directly from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client. Analyze suspicious activity with clear, evidence-backed verdicts. Pivot from a single signup to every account sharing the same device, IP address, or email inbox. Check entities against a cross-operator abuse network, review linked accounts, and efficiently process your fraud review queue. Read-only by default, with no r
      10
      78 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 85 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools overlap heavily: get_user_by_id, get_user_by_username, get_user_by_short_uuid, find_user, and resolve_user all retrieve the same resource, and the stats surface (get_stats, get_stats_digest, get_bandwidth_stats, get_nodes_statistics, get_nodes_metrics, get_recap, get_node_usage, get_stats_nodes_usage, get_stats_nodes_users_usage, get_stats_node_users_usage, get_internal_squad_usage, get_internal_squad_user_usage) is a wall of near-identical names. Some descriptions (e.g. panel_overview, user_report, find_user) explicitly steer away from duplication, but the boundaries are still unclear for many pairs.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Virtually all names are snake_case and the vast majority are get_<resource> reflecting the underlying REST endpoints, so the pattern is predictable. A handful of verb variants (find_user, resolve_user, geocheck_node, panel_overview, user_report, sharing_suspects, node_connections) break the get_ prefix but remain consistent in style.

    Tool Count1/5

    85 tools is far beyond a well-scoped set and essentially exposes the entire REST API one-to-one, including near-duplicate stats and lookup endpoints. Agents must choose among dozens of highly similar reads, which is the extreme end of tool-count mismatch.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface is almost entirely read-only ([READ] endpoints); there are no create/update/delete operations for users, nodes, squads, hosts, or config profiles, so a management workflow dead-ends as soon as a mutation is needed. The read/reporting coverage is broad, but lifecycle coverage for the domain is severely lacking.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues