Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to remnawave-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Claude Code, Claude Desktop, or Cursor to read and manage Remnawave 3.x VPN panel resources — users, nodes, hosts, config profiles, squads, subscription templates, billing, and HWID devices — through the panel's REST API, with contract-driven tool schemas, numeric user IDs, multi-panel config lookup, and an optional readonly mode.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to drive the full Remnawave panel API, exposing one tool per method+path operation (users, nodes, hosts, subscriptions, inbound, bulk actions) plus search, describe, status, audit and metrics helpers. Read-only/read-write gating, deny rules, confirm-preview and dry-run, response secret redaction and an audit journal keep mutations controlled.
      222
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Investigate fraud directly from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client. Analyze suspicious activity with clear, evidence-backed verdicts. Pivot from a single signup to every account sharing the same device, IP address, or email inbox. Check entities against a cross-operator abuse network, review linked accounts, and efficiently process your fraud review queue. Read-only by default, with no r
      10
      99 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with IcePanel for architectural diagram management via MCP clients, such as Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf. Deprecated in favor of a remote MCP server.
      59 npm
      15
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 86 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set contains many closely related read endpoints, such as multiple subscription lookups by different identifiers and numerous stats/usage tools (e.g., get_stats, get_bandwidth_stats, get_stats_digest, get_node_usage). Descriptions are detailed and help distinguish some tools, but an agent still faces ambiguity in selecting the right one for a given query.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a get_ prefix for read operations. A few custom tools (user_report, panel_overview, find_user, geocheck_node) deviate slightly, but the overall naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 86 tools, the server is far beyond a well-scoped size (typically 3–15). Many are thin wrappers around individual API endpoints, which creates an overwhelming and hard-to-navigate surface.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is almost entirely read-only (GET endpoints), with no create, update, or delete operations for users, nodes, subscriptions, or other core resources. For a panel management server, this is a significant gap that will prevent agents from performing lifecycle tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues