get_subpage_configs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description's '[READ]' and endpoint path are largely redundant with that, and it adds no new behavior context such as pagination, result size, or whether full config bodies are returned. Minor added value at best.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short lines, front-loaded with the purpose. The '[READ] GET /api/...' fragment is arguably redundant given the readOnlyHint annotation, but it is compact and does not bloat the definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple parameterless list read with no output schema, the definition is mostly sufficient, but it leaves open whether pagination applies, how large the response is, and how the returned configs differ from those of the singular siblings. Adequate but with clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters and the schema is empty with 100% coverage, so there is nothing for the description to explain. Baseline 4 applies; no parameter ambiguity exists.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Get all subscription page configs'. The plural 'configs' paired with 'all' implicitly distinguishes it from the singular siblings get_subpage_config and get_subpage_config_by_short_uuid, but those siblings are never named, so the differentiation is inferable rather than explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the word 'all' — an agent can guess this is the list-everything variant versus the single-config siblings, but there is no stated when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or named alternative. No prerequisites or filtering conditions are described.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.