Retrieve a paginated list of GitLab groups with filters for ownership, search, sorting, and minimum access level.
List GitLab groups
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number (1-indexed) | |
| sort | No | Sort direction | |
| owned | No | Filter to owned groups | |
| search | No | Search groups by name | |
| order_by | No | Order by field | |
| per_page | No | Results per page (1-100) | |
| top_level_only | No | Only top-level groups | |
| min_access_level | No | Minimum access level |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only states a basic read operation. Does not disclose pagination behavior, default parameter values, authentication requirements, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While extremely short, the description is under-specified and fails to convey important context about scoping or filtering. Conciseness should not sacrifice completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 8 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. Missing information on default sorting, pagination limits, or the structure of returned data.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% with adequate parameter descriptions (e.g., 'Page number (1-indexed)'). The tool description adds no extra meaning, but the schema already covers parameter semantics sufficiently.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List GitLab groups' restates the tool name without adding specificity about what kind of groups or scope. It fails to differentiate from sibling tools like list_group_subgroups or list_group_projects.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_group, list_group_subgroups, or list_group_projects. Missing context on prerequisites or exclusive use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yoda-digital/mcp-gitlab-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server