Skip to main content
Glama

create_tag

Create a new tag in a GitLab project by specifying the project, tag name, and source branch or commit SHA. Optionally add an annotation message and release notes.

Instructions

Create a new tag in a GitLab project

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_idNoProject ID or URL-encoded path
tag_nameNoTag name
refNoBranch/commit SHA to create tag from
messageNoAnnotation message for annotated tag
release_descriptionNoRelease notes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It states 'Create' but fails to disclose required permissions, side effects (e.g., overrides of existing tags), or whether it creates lightweight or annotated tags based on the message parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, but could be expanded slightly without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 5 parameters and no output schema. The description does not explain the return value (e.g., created tag object), error conditions, or impact on existing tags, leaving gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for all 5 parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('a new tag') with context ('in a GitLab project'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_branch or create_release.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No mention of when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., create_release), prerequisites (e.g., existing branch), or exclusions (e.g., lightweight vs annotated tags). The description provides no contextual guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yoda-digital/mcp-gitlab-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server