get_user
Retrieve detailed information about a GitLab user by providing their user ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific user
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | No | User ID |
Retrieve detailed information about a GitLab user by providing their user ID.
Get details of a specific user
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | No | User ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description implies read-only but gives no details on permissions, rate limits, or return structure. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (4 words), which is concise but lacks sufficient detail. Could be improved with structured information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what 'details' are returned or any context about the user lookup.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for a single parameter 'user_id' with description 'User ID'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get details of a specific user' clearly states the action (get) and resource (details of a user), distinguishing it from siblings like get_current_user and list_users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as get_current_user or list_users. No context on prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yoda-digital/mcp-gitlab-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server