create_branch
Create a new branch in a GitLab project by specifying the source ref, branch name, and project ID.
Instructions
Create a new branch in a GitLab project
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ref | No | ||
| branch | No | ||
| project_id | No |
Create a new branch in a GitLab project by specifying the source ref, branch name, and project ID.
Create a new branch in a GitLab project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ref | No | ||
| branch | No | ||
| project_id | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description omits behavioral traits such as error handling when branch exists, required permissions, or side effects beyond creation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is front-loaded and efficient, but overly terse—fails to convey necessary context like parameter roles.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks explanation of parameters, return values, and usage context; insufficient for an agent to correctly invoke the tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, description adds no meaning to parameters 'ref', 'branch', or 'project_id'; names alone are insufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states action ('Create') and resource ('new branch in a GitLab project'), making purpose immediately apparent.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs siblings like fork_repository or create_or_update_file; no mention of prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yoda-digital/mcp-gitlab-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server