create_branch
Create a new branch in a GitLab project by specifying the project ID, branch name, and source reference.
Instructions
Create a new branch in a GitLab project
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | No | ||
| branch | No | ||
| ref | No |
Create a new branch in a GitLab project by specifying the project ID, branch name, and source reference.
Create a new branch in a GitLab project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | No | ||
| branch | No | ||
| ref | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description provides no behavioral details like error handling, idempotency, or permission requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no redundancy, but could be slightly more informative; however, conciseness is good.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description for a tool with no output schema and no annotations; lacks details on return values, prerequisites, and edge cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema coverage, the description does not explain any of the three parameters (project_id, branch, ref), leaving their meaning and format ambiguous.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (create), resource (branch), and scope (GitLab project), effectively distinguishing it from sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as create_tag or create_merge_request. No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yoda-digital/mcp-gitlab-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server