pge_estructura

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It describes the output (tree with links) but does not disclose whether the tool is read-only, requires authentication, has rate limits, or any side effects. The description implies a safe retrieval, but without explicit statement, agents may be uncertain.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of two short paragraphs. The first sentence clearly states the main purpose. There is no unnecessary repetition or verbosity. It earns a high score for efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one optional parameter) and the presence of an output schema, the description is mostly complete. It explains what the tool returns (tree structure with links) and the valid year range. It could be improved by referencing the sibling tool pge_despeses for differentiation, but overall it is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a single parameter 'any_'. The description adds the year range (2015-2025) which is already suggested in the schema's parameter description. Thus, the description provides minimal added value over the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool retrieves the structure of the Spanish State General Budgets (PGE). It specifies returning a tree of sections, subsectors, and programs with links to files. This verb+resource description distinguishes it from siblings like pge_despeses, which likely deals with expense details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions the available year range (2015-2025) which provides some context, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it provide any conditions for when not to use it. The sibling lists include pge_despeses, but no contrast is made.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.