ine_dades_taula

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description partially discloses behavior by stating it returns 'the values of the latest periods' and provides example indicators. However, it does not mention read-only nature, rate limits, data freshness, or limitations on the number of periods (nult default is noted in schema but not description). The output schema covers return format but the description lacks full behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three short sentences, front-loading the main action. Every sentence contributes value, and there is no unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema, so return values are covered. The description is adequate for a simple 2-parameter tool, though it could mention that table IDs come from ine_taules. Overall, it is mostly complete given the context signals.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with both parameters already described. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it repeats 'últims períodes' which aligns with nult. Therefore baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves data from an INE statistical table, specifying 'Obté les dades d'una taula estadística de l'INE' and listing example indicators. It implicitly differentiates from sibling tools like ine_taules (which lists tables) by focusing on retrieving data for a given table, but no explicit comparison.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ine_serie or ine_taules. There is no mention of prerequisites, best practices, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.