mcp-govern
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-govern
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for analyzing Canadian federal spending data, offering tools for contract search, NLP, semantic search, anomaly detection, and money-flow tracing.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Spanish public procurement intelligence, providing tools to query tenders, awards, prices, and renewal forecasts from TED and PLACSP data.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Peruvian government data, enabling search and anomaly detection in public procurement (OSCE) and legislative tracking (Congress), plus semantic search over both domains.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server to query Colombian public procurement data from SECOP I and II in real time, enabling contract research, transparency oversight, and data journalism.102MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying Spanish government open data APIs including grants, legislation, company registry, statistics, and open data catalog. Enables LLMs to access Spanish public information on-the-fly.265MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMulti-agent MCP server for auditing public spending execution of Peruvian regional and local governments, providing tools for CSV inspection, data pipeline orchestration, and historical PDF OCR processing.-
TDQS
Scored across 49 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, targeting specific data sources (e.g., contracts, subsidies, judicial sentences) and operations. Even overlapping concepts like contract searches are differentiated by source (Catalonia vs. BOE) and type (minor vs. public). Descriptions are explicit and avoid ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase with underscores. Prefixes like 'bcn_', 'boe_', 'ine_' clearly indicate the data source, and verbs like 'cercar_', 'detall_', 'llistar_' are uniform. No mixing of styles or irregular patterns.
With 49 tools, the server covers an exceptionally broad domain of government transparency in Spain/Catalonia. While the count is high, each tool addresses a specific need (e.g., detecting contract fragmentation, listing salary tables) and the scope justifies the number. Slightly overwhelming but well-scoped.
The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive, covering searching, detailing, statistical aggregation, pattern detection (concentration, fragmentation), cross-entity investigation, and field listing across multiple official sources (BOE, BORME, INE, etc.). There are no obvious dead ends or missing CRUD operations for a read-only investigative toolkit.