pge_despeses

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool downloads and parses CSVs, which is behavioral, but lacks detail on data freshness, rate limits, or error handling. It is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise: two short paragraphs with front-loaded purpose. Every sentence adds value, no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is complete enough given the presence of an output schema (return values are covered). It explains the source and structure of data. Minor gap: no mention of data scope or caching, but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema: it restates that parameters are 'any' and 'seccio' but offers no new constraints or formatting details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool obtains expenses from the Spanish General Budgets, downloads/parses CSV files, and returns real amounts per budget program. It uses a specific verb (obté) and resource (despeses dels Pressupostos Generals de l'Estat), and distinguishes from siblings like 'cercar_pressupostos' by focusing on expenses.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for obtaining expense data but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'cercar_pressupostos' for overall budgets or 'pge_estructura' for structural data). No when-not or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.