set_clip_loop

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only indicate non-destructiveness. The description does not reveal side effects (e.g., how loop state affects playback) or any additional behavioral details beyond the obvious action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence that front-loads the core action and objects. Every word contributes meaning with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 6 parameters (2 required, 0 documented in schema) and an output schema, the description is too sparse. It omits important context like parameter relationships, value ranges, or the effect of setting loop braces versus looping.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds minimal semantic value. It maps 'start' and 'end' to 'loop braces in beats' and 'looping' to on/off, but does not explain 'track_index', 'clip_index', or 'start_marker' beyond their names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Set' and the resource 'clip's loop braces, start marker, and looping on/off', specifying exactly what the tool modifies. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'set_loop', which could be ambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., set_loop, clip_operation). There is no mention of prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.