quantize_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare destructiveHint=false; description does not contradict. It adds the quantization behavior and humanization hint, but doesn't disclose any side effects or irreversibility beyond what 'quantize' implies. With minimal annotations, more behavioral context could be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no wasted words. Each sentence delivers essential information: operation and parameter details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, description doesn't need to cover return values. It adequately explains the tool's function and parameters for a simple quantization operation, leaving no critical gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% coverage; description compensates by explaining grid and amount meaning and valid values. Required parameters track_index and clip_index are not elaborated but are self-explanatory. Overall, description adds significant value over the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Quantize a MIDI clip' with specific verb and resource. It lists grid options and amount meaning, but doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like set_clip_groove or edit_notes, though that's not critical here.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on grid values and amount usage, including the tip to use <1.0 for humanizing. It does not explicitly state when not to use this tool versus alternatives, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.