fire_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With only destructiveHint: false in annotations, the description carries the burden but only states 'Start playing'. It omits details like behavior if clip is already playing, interaction with other clips, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short with a single sentence and parameter list. It is concise but lacks structured guidance such as usage examples or behavioral notes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (not shown) and many sibling tools, the description is too brief. It does not cover preconditions, effects, or relationships to other actions, making it incomplete for complex decision-making.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema coverage, the description explains each parameter's meaning ('track containing the clip', 'clip slot containing the clip'), adding value beyond the integer type constraint.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Start playing a clip', specifying the verb and resource, and implicitly distinguishes from siblings like stop_clip and fire_scene. However, it does not explicitly differentiate among clip-related actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives like continue_playing or fire_scene, leaving the agent without context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.