choose_pantheon

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description partially compensates by stating requirements (faith, no existing pantheon) but does not disclose outcomes like faith consumption or irreversibility. More detail on side effects would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at three sentences plus an Args line, with no redundant information. It front-loads the core action and immediately follows with critical usage context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, clear preconditions) and the existence of an output schema, the description adequately covers the action, prerequisites, and related tool. Minor missing details like return behavior are acceptable for this scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides concrete examples ('e.g. BELIEF_GOD_OF_THE_FORGE, BELIEF_DIVINE_SPARK') and directs the agent to 'get_pantheon_beliefs' for options, adding meaning beyond the bare schema definition of a string parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the verb 'Found' (likely meaning 'choose') and specifies the resource 'pantheon with the specified belief.' It distinguishes from siblings like 'found_religion' and 'get_pantheon_beliefs' by focusing on the pantheon founding action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states prerequisites ('Requires enough faith and no existing pantheon') and suggests using 'get_pantheon_beliefs' first to see options, providing clear guidance on when and how to use the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.