create-table

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It states 'Create' implying a mutation, but does not disclose what happens if the table already exists, whether special permissions are needed, or any side effects on existing data. This is insufficient for a write operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence. It is concise but could be slightly improved by removing the word 'a' (e.g., 'Create new Table...') without loss of clarity. Still, it is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema and no annotations. The description does not mention what the tool returns upon success (e.g., a table object or confirmation), nor does it address potential failure modes or prerequisites. Given the complexity of creating a table, this is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no additional meaning beyond the input schema. The schema already contains descriptions for both tableName and columns properties, so the baseline is 3. The description merely echoes 'with the given name and columns' without adding constraints, defaults, or examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'Table', with specific qualifiers 'with the given name and columns'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like add-column (adds a column to an existing table) and list-tables (lists existing tables).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention that this is for creating new tables, while modifying existing tables should use add-column or rename-column. No contextual cues for appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.