mcp-shell-server
Servidor de shell MCP
Un servidor de ejecución de comandos de shell seguro que implementa el Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP). Este servidor permite la ejecución remota de comandos de shell autorizados, compatibles con la entrada estándar.
Características
Ejecución segura de comandos : solo se pueden ejecutar los comandos incluidos en la lista blanca
Soporte de entrada estándar : pasa la entrada a los comandos a través de la entrada estándar
Salida completa : devuelve stdout, stderr, estado de salida y tiempo de ejecución
Seguridad del operador de shell : valida los comandos después de los operadores de shell (;, &&, ||, |)
Control de tiempo de espera : establece el tiempo máximo de ejecución de los comandos
Related MCP server: Shell MCP Server
Configuración del cliente MCP en su Claude.app
Versión publicada
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json{
"mcpServers": {
"shell": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"mcp-shell-server"
],
"env": {
"ALLOW_COMMANDS": "ls,cat,pwd,grep,wc,touch,find"
}
},
}
}Versión local
Configuración
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json{
"mcpServers": {
"shell": {
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
".",
"run",
"mcp-shell-server"
],
"env": {
"ALLOW_COMMANDS": "ls,cat,pwd,grep,wc,touch,find"
}
},
}
}Instalación
Instalación mediante herrería
Para instalar Shell Server para Claude Desktop automáticamente a través de Smithery :
npx -y @smithery/cli install mcp-shell-server --client claudeInstalación manual
pip install mcp-shell-serverInstalación mediante herrería
Para instalar Shell Server para Claude Desktop automáticamente a través de Smithery :
npx -y @smithery/cli install mcp-shell-server --client claudeUso
Iniciando el servidor
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" uvx mcp-shell-server
# Or using the alias
ALLOWED_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" uvx mcp-shell-serverLa variable de entorno ALLOW_COMMANDS (o su alias ALLOWED_COMMANDS ) especifica qué comandos se pueden ejecutar. Los comandos se pueden separar por comas con espacios opcionales.
Formatos válidos para ALLOW_COMMANDS o ALLOWED_COMMANDS:
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" # Basic format
ALLOWED_COMMANDS="ls ,echo, cat" # With spaces (using alias)
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls, cat , echo" # Multiple spacesFormato de solicitud
# Basic command execution
{
"command": ["ls", "-l", "/tmp"]
}
# Command with stdin input
{
"command": ["cat"],
"stdin": "Hello, World!"
}
# Command with timeout
{
"command": ["long-running-process"],
"timeout": 30 # Maximum execution time in seconds
}
# Command with working directory and timeout
{
"command": ["grep", "-r", "pattern"],
"directory": "/path/to/search",
"timeout": 60
}Formato de respuesta
Respuesta exitosa:
{
"stdout": "command output",
"stderr": "",
"status": 0,
"execution_time": 0.123
}Respuesta de error:
{
"error": "Command not allowed: rm",
"status": 1,
"stdout": "",
"stderr": "Command not allowed: rm",
"execution_time": 0
}Seguridad
El servidor implementa varias medidas de seguridad:
Lista blanca de comandos : solo se pueden ejecutar comandos explícitamente permitidos
Validación del operador de shell : los comandos después de los operadores de shell (;, &&, ||, |) también se validan con la lista blanca
Sin inyección de shell : los comandos se ejecutan directamente sin interpretación de shell
Desarrollo
Configuración del entorno de desarrollo
Clonar el repositorio
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/mcp-shell-server.git
cd mcp-shell-serverInstalar dependencias, incluidos los requisitos de prueba
pip install -e ".[test]"Ejecución de pruebas
pytestReferencia de API
Argumentos de solicitud
Campo | Tipo | Requerido | Descripción |
dominio | cadena[] | Sí | Comando y sus argumentos como elementos de matriz |
entrada estándar | cadena | No | Entrada que se pasará al comando |
directorio | cadena | No | Directorio de trabajo para la ejecución de comandos |
se acabó el tiempo | entero | No | Tiempo máximo de ejecución en segundos |
Campos de respuesta
Campo | Tipo | Descripción |
salida estándar | cadena | Salida estándar del comando |
error de error estándar | cadena | Salida de error estándar del comando |
estado | entero | Código de estado de salida |
tiempo de ejecución | flotar | Tiempo de ejecución (en segundos) |
error | cadena | Mensaje de error (solo aparece si falla) |
Requisitos
Python 3.11 o superior
mcp>=1.1.0
Licencia
Licencia MIT: consulte el archivo de LICENCIA para obtener más detalles
Available Tools
1 toolshell_executeA
Execute an allowed command as an argv array on the MCP server host. Allowed commands run with the server process's OS authority; the allowlist controls executable names, not what an allowed program does. Allowed commands: wc, grep, cat, ls, pwd Allowed patterns: Default timeout: 30s; maximum timeout: 300s; output cap: 1048576 bytes
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| stdin | No | Input to be passed to the command via stdin | |
| command | Yes | Command and its arguments as array | |
| timeout | No | Maximum execution time in seconds; clamped to server maximum | |
| directory | No | Optional working directory. Omit to use the MCP server process current working directory; relative paths are resolved from that same server process CWD. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does well: it discloses OS authority, warns that the allowlist controls executable names rather than program behavior, and gives timeout and output-cap limits. It does not describe return values such as stdout, stderr, exit code, or truncation signaling, which is a meaningful gap for a command execution tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is short and front-loads the core behavior and security warning. The empty 'Allowed patterns:' line is a small structural blemish that detracts slightly from an otherwise efficient definition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a security-sensitive command execution tool with no annotations and no output schema, the definition covers authority, allowlist limits, timeouts, and output cap. It omits return semantics (stdout/stderr/exit code/truncation behavior) and leaves 'Allowed patterns' blank, so it is adequate but not complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value beyond the schema by specifying the executable allowlist for the command parameter and the default/max timeout values; however, the empty 'Allowed patterns:' line leaves part of the stated constraint incomplete.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb and resource: execute an allowed command as an argv array on the MCP server host. It also names the allowlist scope and the commands available, so an agent can immediately tell what the tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description clearly limits usage to the allowlisted commands (wc, grep, cat, ls, pwd) and notes that commands run with the server process's OS authority. It does not give explicit when-not-to-use guidance, but the allowlist provides strong usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v1.1.0- Changed
shell_execute4 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / directory / descriptionPrevious value: -"Absolute path to a working directory where the command will be executed"New value: +"Optional working directory. Omit to use the MCP server process current working directory; relative paths are resolved from that same server process CWD." - changed
Input schema / properties / timeout / descriptionPrevious value: -"Maximum execution time in seconds"New value: +"Maximum execution time in seconds; clamped to server maximum" - changed
Input schema / properties / timeout / minimumPrevious value: -0New value: +1 - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "command", - "directory" -]New value: +[ + "command" +]
1 tool update
- First observed
shell_execute
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
There is only one tool, so there is no overlap or possibility of misselection. Its purpose—executing an allowlisted shell command—is clear from the name and description.
The sole tool name, shell_execute, is readable and uses a consistent snake_case style. With only one tool there is no convention mixing to penalize.
A single execution tool is enough for a focused shell server, but the surface feels thin: no separate tool for inspecting allowlists, limits, or configuration. It is borderline minimal rather than well-scoped.
The core operation—running an allowed command—is covered, including timeout and output constraints in the description. However, there are minor gaps such as no tool to list allowed commands or report execution policy details.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Remote MCP server exposing your Node Command fleet (files, shell, processes, browser) to AI hosts.
Remote MCP server for supportsheep: run AI interviews and manage support content for your blog.
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Termalin's hosted MCP server. Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP client runs commands, moves files over SFTP, queries databases and reads server metrics and monitoring alerts on your servers, keylessly through Termalin Connectors: no SSH key is handed over and no inbound port is opened. Per-host command policy and an audit log. Needs a termal.in Pro or Team account (new accounts start with a 14-day Pro trial).
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA secure MCP server for executing whitelisted shell commands with resource and timeout controls, designed for integration with Claude and other MCP-compatible LLMs.20389 npm7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows LLMs to execute shell commands and receive their output in a controlled manner.7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA secure terminal execution server that enables controlled command execution with security features and resource limits via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).12 npm11MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA secure server that implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to enable controlled execution of authorized shell commands with stdin support.1MIT