mcp-shell-server
Servidor de shell MCP
Un servidor de ejecución de comandos de shell seguro que implementa el Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP). Este servidor permite la ejecución remota de comandos de shell autorizados, compatibles con la entrada estándar.
Características
Ejecución segura de comandos : solo se pueden ejecutar los comandos incluidos en la lista blanca
Soporte de entrada estándar : pasa la entrada a los comandos a través de la entrada estándar
Salida completa : devuelve stdout, stderr, estado de salida y tiempo de ejecución
Seguridad del operador de shell : valida los comandos después de los operadores de shell (;, &&, ||, |)
Control de tiempo de espera : establece el tiempo máximo de ejecución de los comandos
Related MCP server: Shell MCP Server
Configuración del cliente MCP en su Claude.app
Versión publicada
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json{
"mcpServers": {
"shell": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"mcp-shell-server"
],
"env": {
"ALLOW_COMMANDS": "ls,cat,pwd,grep,wc,touch,find"
}
},
}
}Versión local
Configuración
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json{
"mcpServers": {
"shell": {
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
".",
"run",
"mcp-shell-server"
],
"env": {
"ALLOW_COMMANDS": "ls,cat,pwd,grep,wc,touch,find"
}
},
}
}Instalación
Instalación mediante herrería
Para instalar Shell Server para Claude Desktop automáticamente a través de Smithery :
npx -y @smithery/cli install mcp-shell-server --client claudeInstalación manual
pip install mcp-shell-serverInstalación mediante herrería
Para instalar Shell Server para Claude Desktop automáticamente a través de Smithery :
npx -y @smithery/cli install mcp-shell-server --client claudeUso
Iniciando el servidor
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" uvx mcp-shell-server
# Or using the alias
ALLOWED_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" uvx mcp-shell-serverLa variable de entorno ALLOW_COMMANDS (o su alias ALLOWED_COMMANDS ) especifica qué comandos se pueden ejecutar. Los comandos se pueden separar por comas con espacios opcionales.
Formatos válidos para ALLOW_COMMANDS o ALLOWED_COMMANDS:
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" # Basic format
ALLOWED_COMMANDS="ls ,echo, cat" # With spaces (using alias)
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls, cat , echo" # Multiple spacesFormato de solicitud
# Basic command execution
{
"command": ["ls", "-l", "/tmp"]
}
# Command with stdin input
{
"command": ["cat"],
"stdin": "Hello, World!"
}
# Command with timeout
{
"command": ["long-running-process"],
"timeout": 30 # Maximum execution time in seconds
}
# Command with working directory and timeout
{
"command": ["grep", "-r", "pattern"],
"directory": "/path/to/search",
"timeout": 60
}Formato de respuesta
Respuesta exitosa:
{
"stdout": "command output",
"stderr": "",
"status": 0,
"execution_time": 0.123
}Respuesta de error:
{
"error": "Command not allowed: rm",
"status": 1,
"stdout": "",
"stderr": "Command not allowed: rm",
"execution_time": 0
}Seguridad
El servidor implementa varias medidas de seguridad:
Lista blanca de comandos : solo se pueden ejecutar comandos explícitamente permitidos
Validación del operador de shell : los comandos después de los operadores de shell (;, &&, ||, |) también se validan con la lista blanca
Sin inyección de shell : los comandos se ejecutan directamente sin interpretación de shell
Desarrollo
Configuración del entorno de desarrollo
Clonar el repositorio
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/mcp-shell-server.git
cd mcp-shell-serverInstalar dependencias, incluidos los requisitos de prueba
pip install -e ".[test]"Ejecución de pruebas
pytestReferencia de API
Argumentos de solicitud
Campo | Tipo | Requerido | Descripción |
dominio | cadena[] | Sí | Comando y sus argumentos como elementos de matriz |
entrada estándar | cadena | No | Entrada que se pasará al comando |
directorio | cadena | No | Directorio de trabajo para la ejecución de comandos |
se acabó el tiempo | entero | No | Tiempo máximo de ejecución en segundos |
Campos de respuesta
Campo | Tipo | Descripción |
salida estándar | cadena | Salida estándar del comando |
error de error estándar | cadena | Salida de error estándar del comando |
estado | entero | Código de estado de salida |
tiempo de ejecución | flotar | Tiempo de ejecución (en segundos) |
error | cadena | Mensaje de error (solo aparece si falla) |
Requisitos
Python 3.11 o superior
mcp>=1.1.0
Licencia
Licencia MIT: consulte el archivo de LICENCIA para obtener más detalles
Available Tools
1 toolshell_executeA
Execute a shell command Allowed commands: pwd, grep, cat, ls, wc Allowed patterns: Default timeout: 30s; maximum timeout: 300s; output cap: 1048576 bytes
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| stdin | No | Input to be passed to the command via stdin | |
| command | Yes | Command and its arguments as array | |
| timeout | No | Maximum execution time in seconds; clamped to server maximum | |
| directory | No | Optional working directory. Omit to use the MCP server process current working directory; relative paths are resolved from that same server process CWD. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the transparency burden. It discloses the allowed commands, default/maximum timeout, and output cap, providing useful behavioral context. However, it omits details about stderr handling, output truncation behavior, or the fact that all allowed commands are read-only, preventing a perfect score.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is brief and front-loaded with the primary action, followed by key constraints. However, the 'Allowed patterns: ' line is empty and incomplete, which introduces a minor structural flaw and reduces clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description captures the essential constraints (allowed commands, timeout, output cap) and parameter semantics are handled by the schema. Yet it does not describe the return format, stderr handling, or exit code behavior, and the incomplete 'Allowed patterns' field leaves a gap in coverage for a shell execution tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already provides complete descriptions for all four parameters (100% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The description adds marginal value by mentioning the default timeout (30s) and maximum timeout (300s), which aligns with the 'timeout' parameter but does not elaborate on other parameters beyond what the schema already states.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states 'Execute a shell command' and lists the allowed commands (pwd, grep, cat, ls, wc), making the tool's purpose specific and unambiguous. Even without siblings, the allowed-command list defines scope clearly.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description communicates constraints via 'Allowed commands' and 'Allowed patterns', indicating when the tool is appropriate. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (there are none listed) or provide a 'when not to use' guideline, leaving usage context somewhat implicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v1.1.0- Changed
shell_execute4 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / directory / descriptionPrevious value: -"Absolute path to a working directory where the command will be executed"New value: +"Optional working directory. Omit to use the MCP server process current working directory; relative paths are resolved from that same server process CWD." - changed
Input schema / properties / timeout / descriptionPrevious value: -"Maximum execution time in seconds"New value: +"Maximum execution time in seconds; clamped to server maximum" - changed
Input schema / properties / timeout / minimumPrevious value: -0New value: +1 - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "command", - "directory" -]New value: +[ + "command" +]
1 tool update
- First observed
shell_execute
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. Every action goes through the single shell_execute tool.
The tool name shell_execute follows a clear verb_noun pattern, consistent with common MCP naming conventions. Even with a single tool, the name is predictable and descriptive.
With only one tool, the set feels thin, but for a restricted shell executor it could be acceptable. The scope is narrow, making the tool count borderline rather than clearly excessive or insufficient.
The tool covers the allowed commands (pwd, grep, cat, ls, wc), but the restricted set excludes many typical shell operations like file writing or process control. This suggests notable gaps for a server named 'shell', though the explicit allowlist mitigates some issues.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Remote MCP server for supportsheep: run AI interviews and manage support content for your blog.
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Enable secure connectivity between Sentry issues and debugging data, and LLM clients, using a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server.
Model Context Protocol server for the Apideck Unified API. Connect any MCP-compatible agent framework to 100+ accounting systems, HRIS platforms, file storage providers, and more through one integration. More information https://www.apideck.com/mcp-server
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA secure MCP server for executing whitelisted shell commands with resource and timeout controls, designed for integration with Claude and other MCP-compatible LLMs.203897MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows LLMs to execute shell commands and receive their output in a controlled manner.7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA secure terminal execution server that enables controlled command execution with security features and resource limits via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).11211MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA secure server that implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to enable controlled execution of authorized shell commands with stdin support.1MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tumf/mcp-shell-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server