Skip to main content
Glama
tumf

mcp-shell-server

by tumf
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-shell-server

  • SAGE

    PsYcGoD
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Local-first MCP server and CLI wrapper for AI coding agents. SAGE routes shell commands through a tracked local runner, stores command history on the user’s machine, and returns compressed terminal output to reduce noisy context.
    16
    55 PyPI
    10
    MIT

Related Servers

  • Shell MCP Server

    odysseus0
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that allows LLMs to execute shell commands and receive their output in a controlled manner.
    7
    MIT

  • stela-mcp

    Sachin-Bhat
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server for secure local system operations, enabling shell command execution and file management via a standardized interface.
    14
    1
    Apache 2.0

  • Shell-MCP

    kevinwatt
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A secure MCP server for executing whitelisted shell commands with resource and timeout controls, designed for integration with Claude and other MCP-compatible LLMs.
    20
    389 npm
    7
    MIT

  • Shell Server

    sergio-deras
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that enables users to execute arbitrary shell commands through a terminal tool. It supports custom working directories, configurable execution timeouts, and safe command parsing using shlex.
    -
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as executing allowed shell commands.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool uses a clear verb_noun structure with snake_case, which is consistent. While there is no pattern to compare, the name accurately reflects its function.

Tool Count3/5

At one tool, the server is minimal but arguably appropriate for its narrow purpose of executing allowed shell commands. However, according to the calibration, 1-2 tools feels thin and borderline, so this is not well-scoped for a typical server.

Completeness5/5

For the stated purpose of executing a predefined set of allowed commands, the surface is complete. There are no missing operations for this domain; the allowlist is a configuration parameter, not a missing tool.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive

Resources