Skip to main content
Glama
thenavidm

Kit MCP Server

by thenavidm

Get Creator Profile

get_creator_profile
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the creator profile and account data for a Kit newsletter account, optionally specifying which configured account to use.

Instructions

Get Creator Profile. Reads account data.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
accountNoNamed private account from KIT_ACCOUNTS. Defaults to KIT_DEFAULT_ACCOUNT or the first configured account.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv2.0.1

TDQS

C2.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds only 'Reads account data,' which is redundant with the readOnly annotation and does not disclose return shape, default-account resolution behavior beyond the schema, or any auth requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short and front-loaded, but the first sentence is pure name repetition and the second is thin, so it's terse rather than information-dense. Neither sentence earns much beyond the structured fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description should describe what a creator profile returns; it does not. For a tool with zero explanation of its return payload and no differentiation from get_account, this is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single 'account' parameter is fully documented in the schema (including the KIT_DEFAULT_ACCOUNT fallback). The description adds nothing further, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence merely restates the tool name and title ('Get Creator Profile'), and the second, 'Reads account data,' is vague and arguably misleading – it doesn't clarify what a creator profile is or how it differs from siblings like get_account or list_accounts. No specific resource detail is added beyond the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With get_account and list_accounts among the siblings, an agent has no way to know which to choose from the description alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools