wafle_stores_settings_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation provides idempotentHint, but the description adds no additional behavioral context. It does not disclose permissions, reversibility, or side effects beyond what the schema already implies. The relationship to wafle_stores_update is API-related, not a behavioral trait.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys purpose and relationship to a sibling tool. It contains no redundant wording and front-loads the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple update tool with one required nested object parameter and no output schema, the description together with the schema and annotations is minimally adequate. It lacks information about return behavior and prerequisites like store existence, but the context is sufficient for a straightforward mutation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both 'slug' and 'settings'. The description adds the concept of a 'settings subtree' and mentions merging, but this is already implied by the schema's 'Object of fields to merge.' No significant additional parameter meaning is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates the store's settings subtree, which is specific and distinguishes it from general store updates. It also references wafle_stores_update to clarify the current behavior, removing ambiguity about scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains that this tool is operationally identical to wafle_stores_update today, implying either can be used currently, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over alternatives. It lacks a direct 'use this when...' statement or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.