wafle_coupons_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond the annotations: 'Past usage history is preserved on orders.' This clarifies that deletion does not wipe order history, which is useful for a destructive operation. It does not contradict the idempotent or destructive hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally concise: two short sentences that each convey essential information. The first states the core action, and the second provides an important behavioral note. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description plus annotations cover the main concerns. The preservation note adds context that helps the agent anticipate side effects. However, the lack of parameter semantic explanation prevents a perfect score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 'slug' with a description, but 'coupon_id' lacks any description beyond its type. The tool description does not explain the meaning of 'coupon_id' or its relationship to the slug. Since schema coverage is only 50% and the description does not compensate, this is a significant gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete a coupon by id') with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like wafle_coupons_create, wafle_coupons_list, and wafle_coupons_update by indicating a delete operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, exclusions, or scenarios where this tool is appropriate or inappropriate, aside from the implicit fact that it deletes coupons.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.