generate_script_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description is a single sentence with no behavioral details. It does not disclose effects (e.g., whether it creates files), output format, or any prerequisites. For a tool with no annotations, the description fails to compensate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at one sentence, front-loaded with the core action. However, it may be too minimal given the need for more detail in other dimensions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With three parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too sparse. It does not explain what 'common patterns' are, how the output is delivered, or how to use the generated template effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds context that the templates are for 'common patterns,' which slightly enriches the enum list but does not provide additional semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates a GDScript template for common patterns. While it distinguishes from siblings like generate_network_system by specifying GDScript, it does not explicitly differentiate its scope from other pattern-specific tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Siblings include generate_network_system and generate_ui_component, but the description offers no comparative context or scenarios for when generate_script_template is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.