MCP Project Query Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Project Query Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that provides backend API handling and facilitates communication between microservices. Features an organized structure with controllers, routes, and models for easy extensibility and maintenance.261 npm1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that facilitates note management and weather queries. It enables users to create, access, and summarize notes while providing integration for services like flomo.225 npmISC
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based REST API that integrates project and task management with MCP (Model Context Protocol), allowing users to manage projects and tasks through natural language interactions.3-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that enables image editing operations including brightness adjustment, cropping, and compression through natural language commands.1-
- AlicenseDqualityAmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that enables users to query financial news, stock data, and index information while managing text notes with creation and summarization capabilities.5100 npm849MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA modular MCP server that connects to external APIs, providing tools for weather data, user management, and company operations. Features a scalable architecture with TypeScript support, HTTP client abstraction, and robust error handling.5-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Four tools clearly target project-related operations (add, list all, count, get info), but 'get_random_wallpaper' is an unrelated outlier that creates domain confusion. The project tools themselves are distinct in purpose, though 'get_project_all' and 'get_project_info' could potentially overlap if an agent needs specific project details versus a full list.
Four of the five tools follow a consistent 'verb_project_noun' pattern (e.g., add_project, get_project_all), with clear action-object naming. The outlier 'get_random_wallpaper' breaks this pattern by using a different object (wallpaper) and lacks the 'project' prefix, but the core set is mostly consistent.
With 5 tools, the count is reasonable for a project management server, but the inclusion of an unrelated wallpaper tool makes the scope feel thin for the stated purpose. The project domain has only 4 dedicated tools, which is borderline minimal for basic CRUD operations (e.g., missing update/delete).
For a project query server, there are significant gaps in coverage: it provides create (add_project) and read operations (get all, count, info), but lacks update and delete tools, leaving the lifecycle incomplete. The unrelated wallpaper tool does not contribute to the domain, and the absence of project modification capabilities will likely cause agent failures in workflows requiring edits or removals.