MCP Project Query Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_project_infoC | 根据项目名称查询项目基本信息，包括开始日期、简介、投资金额和当前进度 |
| get_project_countC | 获取项目总数 |
| get_project_allC | 获取全部项目 |
| add_projectD | 新增项目 |
| get_random_wallpaperC | 从Bing壁纸获取随机壁纸，返回壁纸的URL、标题和描述信息 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Four tools clearly target project-related operations (add, list all, count, get info), but 'get_random_wallpaper' is an unrelated outlier that creates domain confusion. The project tools themselves are distinct in purpose, though 'get_project_all' and 'get_project_info' could potentially overlap if an agent needs specific project details versus a full list.
Four of the five tools follow a consistent 'verb_project_noun' pattern (e.g., add_project, get_project_all), with clear action-object naming. The outlier 'get_random_wallpaper' breaks this pattern by using a different object (wallpaper) and lacks the 'project' prefix, but the core set is mostly consistent.
With 5 tools, the count is reasonable for a project management server, but the inclusion of an unrelated wallpaper tool makes the scope feel thin for the stated purpose. The project domain has only 4 dedicated tools, which is borderline minimal for basic CRUD operations (e.g., missing update/delete).
For a project query server, there are significant gaps in coverage: it provides create (add_project) and read operations (get all, count, info), but lacks update and delete tools, leaving the lifecycle incomplete. The unrelated wallpaper tool does not contribute to the domain, and the absence of project modification capabilities will likely cause agent failures in workflows requiring edits or removals.