get_pokemon

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present; description only states output type but lacks details on safety, permissions, error handling, or case sensitivity of the name parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with example, no wasted words. Highly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple lookup tool with one param, description covers output basics but lacks return format or additional behavioral context. With no output schema, more detail would help.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only parameter 'name' has no schema description; example values (garchomp, meowscarada) provide some context but no format constraints or allowed values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns Pokemon's base stats, type, and abilities, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like calc_accuracy which perform calculations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when or when-not to use, or alternatives. The purpose is implied but no guidance relative to siblings like get_ability or get_item.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.