untrash_thread
Restore a thread that has been moved to trash, bringing it back to your Gmail inbox.
Instructions
Remove a thread from the trash
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the thread to remove from trash |
Restore a thread that has been moved to trash, bringing it back to your Gmail inbox.
Remove a thread from the trash
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the thread to remove from trash |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It describes the action simply but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or reversibility. The action is straightforward, so minimal disclosure is acceptable.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence with no unnecessary words. Every part is essential and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is sufficient. It could mention being the inverse of 'trash_thread' but is complete enough for an agent to understand its purpose.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already describes the 'id' parameter completely. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Remove' and the resource 'a thread from the trash', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'untrash_message' by specifying thread.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'trash_thread' or 'delete_thread', though the context implies it reverses trash. No explicit when-not or alternatives provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shinzo-labs/gmail-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server