Skip to main content
Glama

patch_send_as

Update a Gmail send-as alias by modifying its display name, reply-to address, HTML signature, primary status, or alias treatment. Streamline email customization for enhanced communication.

Instructions

Patches the specified send-as alias

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
displayNameNoA name that appears in the 'From:' header
isPrimaryNoWhether this address is the primary address
replyToAddressNoAn optional email address that is included in a 'Reply-To:' header
sendAsEmailYesThe send-as alias to be updated
signatureNoAn optional HTML signature
treatAsAliasNoWhether Gmail should treat this address as an alias

Implementation Reference

  • src/index.ts:1182-1198 (registration)
    Registration of the 'patch_send_as' tool, including description, input schema, and inline handler function that updates a send-as alias via Gmail API patch call.
    server.tool("patch_send_as",
      "Patches the specified send-as alias",
      {
        sendAsEmail: z.string().describe("The send-as alias to be updated"),
        displayName: z.string().optional().describe("A name that appears in the 'From:' header"),
        replyToAddress: z.string().optional().describe("An optional email address that is included in a 'Reply-To:' header"),
        signature: z.string().optional().describe("An optional HTML signature"),
        isPrimary: z.boolean().optional().describe("Whether this address is the primary address"),
        treatAsAlias: z.boolean().optional().describe("Whether Gmail should treat this address as an alias")
      },
      async (params) => {
        const { sendAsEmail, ...patchData } = params
        return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
          const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.sendAs.patch({ userId: 'me', sendAsEmail, requestBody: patchData })
          return formatResponse(data)
        })
      }
  • The handler function for 'patch_send_as' tool. Destructures params to separate sendAsEmail and patch data, then uses handleTool helper to call Gmail API's users.settings.sendAs.patch.
    async (params) => {
      const { sendAsEmail, ...patchData } = params
      return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
        const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.sendAs.patch({ userId: 'me', sendAsEmail, requestBody: patchData })
        return formatResponse(data)
      })
    }
  • Zod input schema for the 'patch_send_as' tool, defining required sendAsEmail and optional fields for updating the send-as alias.
    {
      sendAsEmail: z.string().describe("The send-as alias to be updated"),
      displayName: z.string().optional().describe("A name that appears in the 'From:' header"),
      replyToAddress: z.string().optional().describe("An optional email address that is included in a 'Reply-To:' header"),
      signature: z.string().optional().describe("An optional HTML signature"),
      isPrimary: z.boolean().optional().describe("Whether this address is the primary address"),
      treatAsAlias: z.boolean().optional().describe("Whether Gmail should treat this address as an alias")
    },
  • Generic helper function used by 'patch_send_as' (and other tools) to handle OAuth2 authentication, Gmail client creation, API call execution, and error handling with specific auth error responses.
    const handleTool = async (queryConfig: Record<string, any> | undefined, apiCall: (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => Promise<any>) => {
      try {
        const oauth2Client = queryConfig ? createOAuth2Client(queryConfig) : defaultOAuth2Client
        if (!oauth2Client) throw new Error('OAuth2 client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const credentialsAreValid = await validateCredentials(oauth2Client)
        if (!credentialsAreValid) throw new Error('OAuth2 credentials are invalid, please re-authenticate')
    
        const gmailClient = queryConfig ? google.gmail({ version: 'v1', auth: oauth2Client }) : defaultGmailClient
        if (!gmailClient) throw new Error('Gmail client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const result = await apiCall(gmailClient)
        return result
      } catch (error: any) {
        // Check for specific authentication errors
        if (
          error.message?.includes("invalid_grant") ||
          error.message?.includes("refresh_token") ||
          error.message?.includes("invalid_client") ||
          error.message?.includes("unauthorized_client") ||
          error.code === 401 ||
          error.code === 403
        ) {
          return formatResponse({
            error: `Authentication failed: ${error.message}. Please re-authenticate by running: npx @shinzolabs/gmail-mcp auth`,
          });
        }
    
        return formatResponse({ error: `Tool execution failed: ${error.message}` });
      }
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'patches' but doesn't clarify if this is a partial update, what permissions are required, whether changes are reversible, or how errors are handled. For a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It's appropriately sized for a tool with a well-documented schema, though it could benefit from more context. The structure is front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a mutation tool with 6 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't cover behavioral aspects like side effects, error conditions, or return values, leaving the agent with insufficient information to use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema fully documents all 6 parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as explaining relationships between parameters or typical usage patterns. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does all the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the action ('patches') and the resource ('specified send-as alias'), which is clear but vague. It doesn't specify what 'patches' means operationally (e.g., partial updates vs. full replacement) or differentiate from sibling tools like 'update_send_as' or 'create_send_as', leaving ambiguity about when to use each.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'update_send_as' or 'create_send_as'. The description lacks context about prerequisites, such as needing an existing send-as alias, and doesn't mention exclusions or typical use cases, leaving the agent to infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shinzo-labs/gmail-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server