Freelo Get Finished Tasks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds scoping context but does not disclose pagination, ordering, or response-size behavior. This is adequate but not rich, matching the baseline for annotation-backed read tools.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no filler. The primary behavior is front-loaded, and the alternative routing is included in a single follow-up sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only fetch with a required tasklistId, optional search filter, full schema coverage, and an output schema present, the description provides sufficient context. It covers scope, the key alternative, and the parameter source via the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents tasklistId (including where to obtain it) and search_query. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Fetches completed/finished tasks') and a specific resource ('from a specific tasklist'). It also distinguishes itself from the sibling freelo_get_all_tasks by explicitly noting the cross-project alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says when to use this tool (finished tasks in a specific tasklist) and directs the agent to freelo_get_all_tasks with state_id=2 for finished tasks across all projects. This provides clear routing guidance relative to the main alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.