Freelo Get All Tasks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context by specifying that this fetches tasks across all projects and supports filtering and pagination, which goes beyond a bare 'get tasks' statement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler. The core scope ('all tasks across all projects') is front-loaded, and the second sentence efficiently summarizes the filter capabilities.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the detailed input schema and the presence of an output schema, the description is complete enough for an agent to understand the tool's role. It does not enumerate every filter, but the schema already covers those details, so no critical calling context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents every filter parameter. The description provides a useful high-level summary of filter categories but does not add substantive meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Fetches') and resource ('all tasks across all projects'), and clearly marks this as a broad listing tool with filtering. This distinguishes it from siblings like freelo_get_task_details, freelo_get_finished_tasks, and freelo_get_tasks_by_filter_uuid.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for broad task retrieval across projects, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer it over alternatives or when not to use it. It gives clear context but no exclusions or comparative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.