Skip to main content
Glama
sesonet

freelo-mcp-server

Official
by sesonet

Related Servers

Alternatives to freelo-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An unofficial MCP server that integrates Freelo project management with AI assistants (e.g., Cline, Claude) via the Freelo API, enabling task, project, and comment management through natural language.
      34 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the bexio API, enabling interaction with contacts, sales, accounting, projects, and more through 35 tools. Supports both PAT and OAuth authentication with read-only mode and tool group filtering.
      35
      12 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for Clockify time tracking, exposing 60 raw read tools and five workflows for status, workspace overview, and review of days/weeks.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides 159 tools for interacting with the Freshservice ITSM platform, covering modules such as tickets, assets, and project management. It enables users to manage service desk operations and configuration through the Model Context Protocol.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI agents to interact with OpenProject API v3 for project management, including creating and managing work packages, projects, comments, time entries, boards, and user dashboards.
      24 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools have overlapping scopes: freelo_get_projects vs freelo_get_all_projects, freelo_get_task_details vs freelo_get_task_description, and freelo_get_finished_tasks vs filtered freelo_get_all_tasks. The descriptions help clarify boundaries, but the similarity is enough to cause misselection. Most tools target distinct entities, but the overlaps prevent a higher score.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The freelo_ prefix and verb_noun structure are used consistently across most tools, making the surface predictable. Minor deviations exist: freelo_edit_task uses 'edit' while related tools use 'update', and freelo_search_elasticsearch uses a product name rather than a noun. These are small enough not to break the overall pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    33 tools is well beyond the 25+ threshold and includes several near-duplicate getters such as freelo_get_projects/freelo_get_all_projects, freelo_get_task_details/freelo_get_task_description, and freelo_get_finished_tasks plus filtered freelo_get_all_tasks. While Freelo is a broad PM platform, the toolset could be consolidated significantly without losing capability.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface covers a broad read/create/update landscape, but has clear dead ends: comments can only be listed, subtasks can only be created and read, notes cannot be listed, and there is no delete task or project creation. Common PM operations like adding a comment or removing a task would fail, so the set is not sufficiently complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues