Freelo Create Work Report

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already establish that the tool is non-read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, so the description does not need to repeat those traits. It adds helpful context by framing the created object as a work report/time entry and timing it after work. However, the phrase 'new work report' sits slightly ambiguously with idempotentHint=true, leaving repeated-call behavior somewhat unclear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler. The first sentence fronts the action and resource; the second sentence earns its place by specifying when to use the tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a create tool with a fully documented schema and an output schema present, the description covers what is created and when to use it. It could be slightly stronger by pointing to related siblings for editing or reading work reports, but nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents taskId, reportData, date, minutes, and description with examples. The description adds use-case context but no additional parameter-level meaning, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Creates'), a specific resource ('new work report'), and scope ('for a task'), with a clarifying parenthetical that it is a time entry. This distinguishes it from siblings like freelo_update_work_report and freelo_get_work_reports.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The second sentence provides a clear trigger condition: 'Use after completing work for timesheet entry.' It does not explicitly mention exclusions or alternatives, such as using freelo_update_work_report to modify an existing entry, but the creation context is clearly implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.