get_article_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description focuses on parameters and doesn't disclose behavior such as read-only, rate limits, or authentication requirements (apiKey is mentioned but not explained). Barely adds beyond parameter list.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise single sentence with clear front-loading of purpose. Could benefit from minor structure improvements but effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, yet description doesn't explain return value format or content. In a complex domain with many sibling tools, this leaves the agent uninformed about what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so baseline is 3; description adds value by clarifying that mst/lawId+jo are required and explains source of mst/lawId from search_law.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool retrieves precise legal article detail by hierarchical units (provision/hang/ho/mok), distinguishing it from other tools like get_law_text.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_law_text or get_article_history. It implies use for precise queries but doesn't exclude other cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.