get_alio_annexes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states the extraction action without mentioning side effects, read-only nature, auth requirements, or rate limits. A read-only hint or destructive hint is missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence efficiently conveys purpose and key parameters (annexNumber, listOnly). No wasted words, front-loaded with main intent. Fits well within length constraints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters fully described in schema and no output schema, the description covers core functionality. Missing details about response format or examples, but the tool is straightforward and consistent with sibling tools. Appropriate for a simple extraction tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter already has a description. The description reiterates the role of annexNumber and listOnly but adds no significant semantic meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool extracts annex sections from ALIO regulation text, and explains how to limit by annex number or get only the list. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_alio_regulation (full regulation) and get_annexes (likely for other sources).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage context (when you need annexes) but does not explicitly provide when-to-use vs alternatives. It mentions optional parameters for filtering but no guidance on choosing between regId and title or when to avoid this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.