Skip to main content
Glama
scvcoder

korean-law-alio-mcp

by scvcoder

get_appeal_review_decision_text

Retrieve the full text of a Korean appeal review committee decision by providing its unique ID. Access official rulings for legal analysis and reference.

Instructions

[소청심사] 소청심사위원회 재결례 전문.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes특별행정심판재결례일련번호 (검색 결과에서 획득)
apiKeyNo법제처 Open API 인증키(OC). 사용자가 제공한 경우 전달
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behaviors. It only states 'full text' but omits authentication requirements (apiKey), error handling, or data freshness. Minimal behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief (one phrase in Korean). While not verbose, it is under-specified and lacks essential context, failing to be appropriately informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the large set of sibling tools for retrieving decision texts, the description does not distinguish this tool or clarify its return format. No output schema; the description is incomplete for the agent to use confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and both parameters are well-described in the schema. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves the full text of appeal review committee decisions. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_admin_appeal_text or get_acr_decision_text, which may cause confusion for the agent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as search_appeal_review_decisions. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or usage context mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/scvcoder/korean-law-alio-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server