sassy_update_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden. It implies a read-only listing operation but does not disclose what the return value looks like, whether network access is involved, or any side effects. The only behavioral note is the tag default, which is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose. The parenthetical adds minor noise but does not bloat the text. Every part earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description should explain what 'downloadable assets' means in terms of return structure, but it does not. It also lacks context about the source of releases or how tag relates to sibling tools. Still, for a one-parameter read-only tool, it achieves a minimum viable level.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides only the tag parameter with no description. The text adds that 'tag defaults to the latest release' and implies tag is a release identifier, which is useful but still lacks format, allowed values, or examples. For a one-parameter tool, this is adequate but not rich.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb and resource: 'List downloadable assets for a release.' It also adds scoping via the tag parameter. However, the parenthetical 'apt-list-upgradable equivalent' is potentially misleading because apt-list-upgradable lists upgradable packages, not release assets, and it doesn't distinguish this tool from siblings like sassy_update_check.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as sassy_update_check or sassy_update_changelog. Only the default behavior for the tag parameter is mentioned, which is not enough to orient an agent on selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.