sassy_update_changelog

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states that it returns release notes, implying a read operation, but does not disclose potential side effects, network dependencies, authentication requirements, or error behavior. This minimal transparency is insufficient for a tool with no annotation support.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys the core purpose and the key parameter default without any wasted words. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description covers the essential context: what it does (returns release notes body) and the parameter behavior (defaults to latest). It does not detail output format or error handling, but these are less critical for this simple retrieval tool. Overall, it is adequately complete for the agent to select and invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter 'tag' with no description (0% coverage). The description compensates by explaining that the tag refers to the release tag and defaults to the latest version. This adds meaning beyond the raw schema, giving the agent the necessary context to use the parameter correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Return the release notes body for a tag (defaults to latest).' It specifies both the action and resource, and the mention of 'defaults to latest' adds useful scope. This distinguishes it from sibling update-related tools like sassy_update_check and sassy_update_apply.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It does not mention related tools or conditions that would warrant its use, nor does it exclude any scenarios. The only context is the default-to-latest behavior, which is a parameter detail rather than usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.