sassy_setup_github

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the disclosure burden. It states it opens a browser, validates, and saves, which are key behaviors, and the action list indicates multiple modes. However, it omits prerequisites, persistence details, and what happens on validation failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short lines, front-loaded with the main purpose, and the parameter lines are tight. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has multiple actions, no annotations, and a sparse schema, so the description is the primary source of context. It names the actions and token condition but leaves details of each action and the workflow implicit. Adequate for basic invocation but not complete guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema provides no descriptions (0% coverage), but the description enumerates the action values and clarifies that token is only used for save_token. This compensates well for the schema gap, though it doesn't elaborate on each action's effect.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verbs ('Guide', 'Opens browser, validates, saves') and clearly identifies the resource (GitHub token). It does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like sassy_setup_generate_token, but the purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or alternatives are given. The action list implies a multi-step workflow, but there is no guidance on when to choose this tool over sibling setup tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.