Skip to main content
Glama

sassy_get_config

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the current SassyMCP configuration and live system snapshot to inspect server settings and diagnose performance or environment issues before making changes.

Instructions

Read-only. Returns the full SassyMCP configuration plus a live system snapshot: the config dict (default shell, file read/write line limits, allowed directories, blocked commands, interceptor and permission-engine settings, panel port/enabled), OS and Python details, process and system memory, disk usage, PID, uptime seconds, CPU count, loaded tool groups, and tool-usage stats from the audit log. Takes no parameters. Use to inspect current server settings before calling sassy_set_config, or to diagnose performance and environment issues. Prefer over guessing config values.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.15.1
    • addedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +true
    • removedOutput schema / properties
      Removed value: -{
      -  "result": {
      -    "title": "Result",
      -    "type": "string"
      -  }
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / required
      Removed value: -[
      -  "result"
      -]
    • changedOutput schema / title
      Previous value: -"sassy_get_configOutput"New value: +"sassy_get_configDictOutput"
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, and the description reinforces this with "Read-only." It adds useful behavioral context by specifying that it returns a live snapshot including system, process, and audit-derived stats, which goes beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is detailed but well-organized with a colon-introduced list of returned fields. It is somewhat long, but every component—contents, no-params note, usage context, and preference guidance—serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only configuration tool, the description covers what it returns, when to use it, why it is useful, and that no arguments are needed. The presence of an output schema further reduces the burden of describing return structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has zero parameters and 100% coverage, so there is little to add. The description still explicitly states "Takes no parameters," removing any ambiguity for the agent, which is appropriate at the baseline for a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a clear verb and resource: "Returns the full SassyMCP configuration plus a live system snapshot," then enumerates the contents in detail. It clearly differentiates from sibling sassy_set_config by framing this as the inspection counterpart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance is given: "Use to inspect current server settings before calling sassy_set_config, or to diagnose performance and environment issues." It also advises "Prefer over guessing config values," which tells the agent when this tool is the right choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools