create_reservation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the action and parameters, omitting any discussion of side effects, permissions, validation (e.g., availability checks), or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (one-line purpose, usage pattern, then parameter list with no extraneous words). Structure is clear and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description does not need to cover return values. It adequately explains the basic creation operation but lacks behavioral context such as whether the reservation is immediately confirmed or if there are constraints on overlapping bookings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, requiring the description to fully explain parameters. It lists all six parameters with brief but helpful descriptions (e.g., ISO datetime format for start_time, purpose of additional_member_ids). Some descriptions are minimal (e.g., 'Target court id.').

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new court reservation' and includes a concrete usage example. It distinguishes the tool from siblings like cancel_reservation, get_reservation, and list_reservations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides an explicit usage example ('Use when: ...') that clarifies the intended invocation pattern. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or compare it to alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.