ga4_properties_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description declares the tool as read-only and lists returned fields, which is useful. However, with no annotations provided, the description could disclose more behavioral traits such as pagination behavior, authorization requirements, or rate limits. The schema covers some details, but the description lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences front-loading the action. Every sentence adds value with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 parameters fully described in schema, no output schema, and no annotations, the description adequately explains the purpose and output fields. It could mention pagination behavior explicitly, but the schema covers it. Overall, it is fairly complete for a listing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add new meaning beyond what the schema already provides for parameters; it merely restates the purpose of accountId indirectly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (List), the resource (GA4 properties), and the scope (under a given parent account). It also specifies the returned fields, distinguishing it from sibling tools like ga4_property_get.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool (to list all properties for an account) but does not explicitly state alternatives or when not to use it. No comparison with sibling tools is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.