get_dlp_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the burden. It usefully discloses the failure path (a status field and an error message) for what is implicitly a read-only lookup, but says nothing about whether the profile must pre-exist, what permissions are needed, or how missing objects are handled.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence and the docstring layout is compact. The Returns block is somewhat redundant given an output schema exists, but the total length is modest.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description needn't enumerate return keys, yet it spends roughly half its text doing so while omitting the more valuable context: relationship to list/create/update/delete_dlp_profile siblings and error conditions. Adequate but with clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate, but it only offers near-tautological glosses: "adom: ADOM name" and "name: DLP profile name," which add essentially nothing beyond the schema titles "Adom" and "Name." It does not clarify ADOM scoping semantics, name-matching expectations, or case sensitivity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ("Get detailed information about a DLP profile") that an agent can immediately act on. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from the nearby list_dlp_profiles sibling, but "detailed information" plus the required name parameter makes the single-object scope inferable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: an agent infers it should call this when it already knows the ADOM and profile name, versus list_dlp_profiles for enumeration. No explicit when-to-use, prerequisites, or named alternative is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.