list_service_groups

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description describes the return structure (dict with status, count, groups, message) but does not disclose potential side effects, performance characteristics, or whether pagination is supported. The disclosure of defaults and partial match behavior adds some value, but overall transparency is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with a clear one-line summary, followed by structured Args and Returns sections. While slightly verbose, every sentence serves a purpose. The repetition of parameter names from schema is acceptable given the added semantics.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's two optional parameters and the presence of a return schema, the description covers the core functionality and parameter behavior. However, it lacks guidance on when to prefer this list operation over the 'get_service_group' tool, and does not address potential edge cases like empty results or pagination.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage. The description adds meaningful detail: adom's default value (from env var or 'root') and name_filter's partial match behavior. This compensates for the schema's lack of documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'list' and resource 'service groups' scoped to 'an ADOM', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_service_group' (single retrieval) and 'list_services' (different resource).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_service_group' or 'list_services'. Usage is implied by the description but lacks context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.