Skip to main content
Glama
rstierli

FortiManager MCP Server

by rstierli

list_tasks

List all tasks in FortiManager to view background operations like policy installation and device provisioning, with optional filtering by task state.

Instructions

List all tasks in FortiManager.

Tasks represent background operations like policy installation, device provisioning, and other long-running processes.

Args: filter_state: Filter by task state (optional): - "pending": Not started - "running": Currently executing - "done": Completed - "error": Failed - "cancelling": Being cancelled - "cancelled": Cancelled

Returns: dict: Task list with keys: - status: "success" or "error" - count: Number of tasks - tasks: List of task objects with id, state, progress, etc. - message: Error message if failed

Example: >>> # Get all tasks >>> result = await list_tasks()

>>> # Get only running tasks
>>> result = await list_tasks(filter_state="running")

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
filter_stateNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes return format and filter behavior, but does not mention potential limits (e.g., pagination) or side effects. Without annotations, the description carries the burden; it's adequate but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-organized with Args, Returns, and Example sections. It is concise with no redundant information, fitting the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity and presence of an output schema, the description covers all needed aspects: purpose, parameter, return format, and an example. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description fully documents the sole parameter filter_state, listing all valid enum values with clear descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List all tasks in FortiManager' and explains tasks as background operations, distinguishing it from siblings like get_task (single task) and wait_for_task (waiting).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides usage context with optional filter_state parameter and an example. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rstierli/fortimanager-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server