execute_script_on_devices

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states that the tool returns a Task ID for monitoring, implying asynchronous execution, but it does not disclose other behavioral traits such as whether it modifies state, required permissions, error handling, or limits on the number of devices.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the purpose. It uses a simple Args/Returns structure without redundancy. However, a bit more detail on parameters would not harm conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists (not shown), the description appropriately mentions the return value (Task ID). However, with three required parameters and no schema descriptions, the description is minimal and could provide more context about parameters and usage flow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It only lists names (adom, script, devices) without any details on formats, constraints, or valid values. For example, it does not specify whether devices are hostnames or serial numbers, or what constitutes a valid script name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Execute a CLI script on multiple devices,' which is a specific verb-resource combination. It distinguishes from siblings like 'execute_script_on_device' (single device) and 'execute_script_on_device_group' (device group) by the plural 'devices' and the mention of multiple devices in the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies that this tool is for multiple devices, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives like 'execute_script_on_device' for a single device or 'execute_script_on_device_group' for a group. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.