Skip to main content
Glama
rrvrs

jira-alerts-mcp

Escalate a JSM alert through an escalation policy

jsm_escalate_alert
Idempotent

Escalate an alert immediately when it isn't being picked up, paging the next on-call responders without waiting for the escalation timer.

Instructions

Push a JSM alert into an escalation policy immediately, rather than waiting for it to escalate on its own.

Use this when an alert is not getting picked up and waiting out the escalation timer is not acceptable. It pages the next people in that policy now.

Args:

  • alert_id (string): the full alert id (not the tinyId)

  • escalation_id (string): id of the escalation policy to run

Returns: { "requestId": string, "result": string, "alert_id": string }

IMPORTANT: this action is asynchronous. Verify with jsm_get_request_status using the returned requestId.

This pages people out of band, ahead of the schedule they agreed to. Confirm with the user before escalating on their behalf.

escalation_id is an escalation policy id — not a team id and not a schedule id. The three are separate objects with separate ids, and passing the wrong one fails with 422 rather than escalating to something adjacent.

Examples:

  • "Nobody has picked this up, escalate it" -> get the escalation id for the team, then escalate

Constraints and errors:

  • HTTP 422 or a failed request status usually means escalation_id is not an escalation, or belongs to a different team than the alert.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
alert_idYesFull alert id, e.g. '9b251e07-73c9-4907-9996-8cb53a6a20d0-1704440650350'. This is NOT the short tinyId shown in the JSM UI — get the full id from jsm_list_alerts first.
escalation_idYesId of the escalation policy to escalate through. This is an escalation id, not a team or schedule id — the three are separate objects with separate ids.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNo
alert_idYes
requestIdNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Addedv2.0.0

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the side effect of paging people out of band, the async request/response pattern, and the need for user confirmation. It also explains error behavior for invalid escalation IDs. These details go beyond the annotations and accurately represent the action's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat repetitive, particularly around paging people and distinguishing escalation IDs from team/schedule IDs, but the extra details serve important disambiguation and safety purposes. Overall it is well-organized with clear sections for arguments, returns, constraints, and examples.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description includes the return shape, async verification instructions, common error causes with HTTP 422, and examples. It provides enough context for an agent to decide when to use the tool and what to expect, complementing the input schema and annotations effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters are fully described in the schema, with additional context in the description. The alert_id description clarifies that the full ID is required, not the tinyId, and the escalation_id description distinguishes escalation policies from team and schedule IDs. The description includes a concrete example for alert_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Push a JSM alert into an escalation policy immediately' and distinguishes it from sibling alert actions by specifying that it pages the next people in the policy now. The title and description align on the verb and resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a concrete condition for use: 'when an alert is not getting picked up and waiting out the escalation timer is not acceptable.' It also explicitly instructs to confirm with the user before escalating and notes the async nature of the action, providing clear usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rrvrs/jira-alerts-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server